FCA ACD73/2023 - COLIN GEORGE DUNSTAN v ROBYN ORR & ANOR

 Documents filed in FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA 

COLIN GEORGE DUNSTAN v ROBYN ORR & ANOR 

File Number ACD73/2023

Application for Leave to Appeal - lodged 19/12/2023

Draft Notice of Appeal - lodged 19/12/2023

Affidavit of Colin Dunstan, 18/12/2023 - lodged 19/12/2023

Orders (Wigney J) , 07/12/2023 - lodged 19/12/2023

Dunstan v Orr (No 2) [2023] FCA 1536, 07/12/2023 - lodged 19/12/2023

Supplementary Affidavit of Colin Dunstan, 12/01/2024 - lodged 12/01/2024

Supplementary Notice of Appeal – Draft, 12/01/2024 - lodged 12/01/2024

Further Supplementary Affidavit of Colin Dunstan, 05/02/2024 - lodged 05/02/2024

Popular posts from this blog

Applicant's Affidavit of 14 May 2025 - Dunstan v Orr and Others - ACD57 of 2024

Form 59 Rule 29.02(1)                                                                                                                     Affidavit No.       ACD 57 of 2024 Federal Court of Australia District Registry: Australian Capital Territory Division : General COLIN GEORGE DUNSTAN Applicant ROBYN ORR and others Respondents   Affidavit of:...
Read more

Does the Tax Commissioner know how his legal representatives conduct litigation?

Image
Tax Commissioner defends outrageous conduct of legal representatives The legal profession has high standards for how litigation is to be conducted.  The Commissioner of Taxation's website says: "As a government agency, we apply the highest standards of ethical behaviour when we are involved in litigation. ...[We] need to do the right thing, be fair and have the highest professional standards ..." A statement of claim lodged in the Federal Court of Australia recently details unprofessional and unethical conduct by the Tax Commissioner's legal representatives in defending an action alleging serious fraud by senior Tax Office delegates of the Tax Commissioner.  The Tax Commissioner may have acknowledged that his legal representatives had behaved inappropriately - if he was aware of the issue. Instead, a team of legal representatives was sent to the Federal Court of Australia with the unenviable task of devising a way to obstruct, and presumably to defeat the litigation. ...
Read more